|
1
|
- Bill Brier
- Vice President, Policy & Public Affairs
- EEI-North Dakota Forums
- April 15-17, 2008
|
|
2
|
- Customers are consuming more electricity: Utilities are meeting that
demand
- Energy efficiency, demand-side management: Making a difference
- Resource diversity: Key to reliability and environmental responsibility
- Environmental standards: Impact on planning and costs
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Inefficient, older power plants will be retired; new plants built.
- 240 gigawatts (GW) of new capacity will be needed by 2030.*
- New capacity costs likely will be in excess of $400 billion.
|
|
8
|
- Nearly $75 billion will have been invested between 2000 and 2010.
- Customers will benefit from newer technologies and reliability.
|
|
9
|
- Since 2000, the industry has invested almost $109 billion in the
nation’s distribution system.
|
|
10
|
- From 2002-2005, the electric utility industry spent at least $21 billion
to comply with federal environmental laws; state and local rules drive
costs even higher.
- EPA estimates that two rulemakings—the Clean Air Interstate Rule and the
Clean Air Mercury Rule—will cost electric utilities and their customers
almost $50 billion from 2007 to 2025.*
- New technologies are needed to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions,
but will come with a cost.
- * CAMR is currently being resolved in the courts; compliance costs could rise
under alternative regulatory regimes.
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Five key efforts underway:
- Encouraging “smart” and energy-efficient buildings
- Promoting “smart” and energy-efficient appliances and electric
technologies
- Commercializing plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs)
- Accelerating development of “smart” grid and advanced metering
infrastructure
- Developing “smart” rates to give customers more control over
electricity bills
|
|
14
|
- State regulatory agencies must balance several priorities:
- Affordable electricity prices
- Reliable service
- Environmental protection
- Agencies may reach different conclusions about right path for their
states
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
- Help promote fuel diversity
- Reduce environmental impact
- Low or no fuel costs
|
|
17
|
- High initial capital costs
- Geographic limitations
- Intermittent nature
- Transmission availability and cost
- Frequent expiration of production tax credit
- Environmental and aesthetic challenges (NIMBY)
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- EEI supports federal action or legislation to reduce GHG emissions that:
- Ensures the development and cost-effective deployment of a full suite
of “climate-friendly” technologies, and helps provide for their
funding;
- Minimizes economic disruption to customers and avoids harm to the
competitiveness of U.S. industry;
- Utilizes an economy-wide approach to GHG reductions.
- * The full text of the EEI climate change principles is available at www.eei.org.
|
|
22
|
- Addressing climate change requires an aggressive and sustained
commitment to a full set of technologies:
- Efficiency
- Renewables
- Clean coal technologies
- Carbon capture and storage
- Nuclear
- Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Smart grids and communications infrastructures.
- A grid infrastructure able to operate with up to 30% intermittent
renewable generation.
- Significant expansion of nuclear energy and a viable strategy for
managing spent fuel.
- New coal-based generation units operating with 90+% CO2
capture and storage in a variety of geologies.
|
|
25
|
- According to EPRI, it will cost up to $1.8 trillion to dramatically
reduce CO2 emissions by 2050.
- Investing now in research and development could reduce overall costs.
EPRI believes investments of about $1.4 billion per year, through 2030,
could decrease the cost to $900 billion.
- After technology reaches commercialization phase, continued investment
is needed to operate and maintain technologies.
|
|
26
|
- The industry is in a “build” phase to meet demand projections.
- The industry promotes energy efficiency and demand-side management.
- Resource diversity is the key to reliability and environmental
responsibility.
- Environmental standards impact planning and costs.
|
|
27
|
|