Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Investing in America’s
Electric Future
  • Bill Brier
  • Vice President, Policy & Public Affairs
  • EEI-North Dakota Forums
  • April 15-17, 2008
2
Overview
  • Customers are consuming more electricity: Utilities are meeting that demand
  • Energy efficiency, demand-side management: Making a difference
  • Resource diversity: Key to reliability and environmental responsibility
  • Environmental standards: Impact on planning and costs
3
Electricity use in the
typical U.S. home
4
U.S. economic growth:
Linked to electricity growth
5
Demand for electricity:
Projected to increase 30% by 2030
6
Electricity Supply Margins Projected to Fall Below Minimum Target Levels in Some Areas of North America in Next 2-3 Years
7
Investments in Generation
    • Inefficient, older power plants will be retired; new plants built.
    • 240 gigawatts (GW) of new capacity will be needed by 2030.*
    • New capacity costs likely will be in excess of $400 billion.


8
Transmission Investments
  • Nearly $75 billion will have been invested between 2000 and 2010.
  • Customers will benefit from newer technologies and reliability.
9
Distribution Investments
  • Since 2000, the industry has invested almost $109 billion in the nation’s distribution system.
10
Environmental Compliance Costs
  • From 2002-2005, the electric utility industry spent at least $21 billion to comply with federal environmental laws; state and local rules drive costs even higher.
  • EPA estimates that two rulemakings—the Clean Air Interstate Rule and the Clean Air Mercury Rule—will cost electric utilities and their customers almost $50 billion from 2007 to 2025.*
  • New technologies are needed to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, but will come with a cost.


  • * CAMR is currently being resolved in the courts; compliance                     costs could rise under alternative regulatory regimes.
11
 
12
Energy-efficiency makes a difference
13
EEI’s Energy-Efficiency Initiatives
  • Five key efforts underway:
    • Encouraging “smart” and energy-efficient buildings
    • Promoting “smart” and energy-efficient appliances and electric technologies
    • Commercializing plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs)
    • Accelerating development of “smart” grid and advanced metering infrastructure
    • Developing “smart” rates to give customers more control over electricity bills
14
The regulatory dilemma
    • State regulatory agencies must balance several priorities:
      • Affordable electricity prices
      • Reliable service
      • Environmental protection
    • Agencies may reach different conclusions about right path for their states


15
 
16
Benefits of Renewables
  • Help promote fuel diversity
  • Reduce environmental impact
  • Low or no fuel costs



17
Challenges of renewables
  • High initial capital costs
  • Geographic limitations
  • Intermittent nature
  • Transmission availability and cost
  • Frequent expiration of production tax credit
  • Environmental and aesthetic challenges (NIMBY)


18
 
19

Wind generation
20
 
21
Environmental planning and costs
  • EEI supports federal action or legislation to reduce GHG emissions that:
    • Ensures the development and cost-effective deployment of a full suite of “climate-friendly” technologies, and helps provide for their funding;
    • Minimizes economic disruption to customers and avoids harm to the competitiveness of U.S. industry;
    • Utilizes an economy-wide approach to GHG reductions.

  • * The full text of the EEI climate change principles is available at www.eei.org.
22
What Will It Take?
  • Addressing climate change requires an aggressive and sustained commitment to a full set of technologies:
    • Efficiency
    • Renewables
    • Clean coal technologies
    • Carbon capture and storage
    • Nuclear
    • Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles


23
CO2 Reductions…
What’s technically feasible?
24
Key technology challenges
  • Smart grids and communications infrastructures.
  • A grid infrastructure able to operate with up to 30% intermittent renewable generation.
  • Significant expansion of nuclear energy and a viable strategy for managing spent fuel.
  • New coal-based generation units operating with 90+% CO2 capture and storage in a variety of geologies.
25
Key Funding Challenges
  • According to EPRI, it will cost up to $1.8 trillion to dramatically reduce CO2 emissions by 2050.
  • Investing now in research and development could reduce overall costs. EPRI believes investments of about $1.4 billion per year, through 2030, could decrease the cost to $900 billion.
  • After technology reaches commercialization phase, continued investment is needed to operate and maintain technologies.
26
Review
  • The industry is in a “build” phase to meet demand projections.
  • The industry promotes energy efficiency and demand-side management.
  • Resource diversity is the key to reliability and environmental responsibility.
  • Environmental standards impact planning and costs.
27
"Questions"
  • Questions?